Opinion letter, July 7:
The utilities and PSC will try to convince customers they could not possibly have any symptoms from the meter bursts and pulses of radiation. After all, their grand monopoly party requires they dismiss any claims about harm.
To understand the biological mechanisms that can cause symptoms from pulsed, modulated radiofrequency and microwaves, see:
Diagnosis and Management of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS): Rapid Overview for a mixed audience
given by Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe: British Society of Ecological Medicine (BSEM – March 2014)
VISIT the new PROTECT WISCONSIN site for consumer protection information about wireless safety issues, including smart meters. (click on PROTECT WISCONSIN here.)
Become familiar with THIS BILL to promote as consumer protection legislation in Wisconsin. Share it with lawmakers and action groups to keep the ball rolling here. AB345 was a good start last year. Let’s keep the push for opt out freedom moving.
Emissions from transmitting utility meters distribute WITHIN the home via home wiring, not only through the air and walls.
This multiplies exposure and impacts to health.
The report states:
“The FCC testing for smart meters is done in an isolated laboratory, divorced from the context in which these meters are intended to be used, connected to the wiring in a home or business.”
Logical thinking will also reveal that true exposures must include neighbors’ meter emissions, including what gets onto the connected grid wiring and ductwork. Logical thinking will also show that multiple meters at apartment buildings and densely packed homes will magnify exposures. Logical thinking will add in cell phone antennas and other sources of microwave radiation to the destructive mix. But since when do regulators think logically or put public health before industry?
KUDOS to Ft. Collins CO people for speaking truth to power at a board meeting to the row of stone-faced leaders.
Wisconsin has its own deadpan brigade of utility execs, public service commission czars and local utility boards, refusing individual opt outs. They have been refusing us since at least 2009.
The witness and science shared in this video are well worth spreading among Wisconsinites. The meeting is universal – it could be Anywhere, U.S.A. Keep the truth coming!
Stop Smart Meters WhistleStop TOUR interviews sunny Florida residents (these residents offer a sunny hope):
So far in Wisconsin, “NO” is ALWAYS the answer of the Public Service Commission to smart meter opt out requests. The first documented health-related request appeared in a 2003 correspondence. Starting in 2009, rashes of requests appear in PSC public records. Each year since, the Commission has DENIED ALL customers who request analog meter options for health and/or privacy.
Stay tuned for PROTECT Wisconsin action alert link.
Until then, please email firstname.lastname@example.org and ask to get Wisconsin updates. See also Electrical Pollution
A compilation from California citizen rights direct action taken against forced smart meters:
Wisconsin “room of doom” for citizen smart meter freedom:
IARC (International Agency for the cancer research arm of the World Health Organization) recently announced in a London press meeting that the world is facing a tsunami of new cancers, as estimated in its World Cancer Report 2014.
THIS witty, well-researched REVIEW of that press meeting in London on February 3, 2014, READS LIKE the beginning of a NOVEL of intrigue, with powerful players and world health at stake.
But it is NONFICTION, I am sorry to say. And during the course of this (real time) story you or your loved ones may fall ill or die to preventable cancers and other conditions. How? Why, you may ask? Just read Susan Foster’s article to understand what we are facing. A fiction writer would have trouble weaving this tale of power and deceit and billions of dollars in play at the expense of everyday people’s lives.
One revealing quote specifically fingers the FCC/IEEE and ICNIRP:
“There is a consistent pattern of increased risk for glioma (a malignant brain tumor) and acoustic neuroma with use of mobile and cordless phones,” stated Lennart Hardell, MD at Orebro University, Sweden. “Epidemiological evidence shows that radiofrequency [radiation] should be classified as a human carcinogen. The existing FCC/IEEE and ICNIRP public safety limits and reference levels are not adequate to protect public health.”
So, anyone that tells you a product is safe because the FCC said so is wrong. This includes utilities and telecom companies. Dead wrong, all.